Recruiting In Yoga Pants

Dressing up is for suckers

Author: Amy Miller (Page 1 of 4)

Facts VS Opinions

May 5, 2024 /

No really. There is a difference.

This came to an amusing yet frustrating head recently when I had the audacity to share an amazing post from my friend Dan (DanFromHR). You can read it for yourself HERE. The heart of Dan’s post was a factual explanation of how many companies navigate high cost of labor (HCOL) areas. To recap, in the US at least – there are going to be higher paying markets (most notably NYC, Bay Area, Boston) that will have a premium adjustment based on the COL in that area.

This is a FACT.


I know this is a thing that is known or proven to be true because I have worked for numerous companies that have created pay ranges and COL adjustments based on location for years. I have made PLENTY of those offers. I’ve even in rare cases been able to offer someone the choice between locations – many opted for the lower COL areas (Seattle vs Sunnyvale, for example) because the 10% or so premium wasn’t worth the lowered buying power. Cost of LIVING (not to be confused with cost of LABOR) is definitely a factor those new hires took into consideration before choosing their final offer location. I respect that choice.

What does this look like in action? Let’s say a national company is hiring in Kansas City. They also have offices in Ft. Lauderdale and NYC. Most of the country is probably going to be in what we call “standard” comp ranges. The average compensation for a marketing manager is 80-120K, with 100K being the “midpoint” or 1.0 compa ratio. (Here’s a great video on compa ratios from my pal Jessica from Workology)

It would not be crazy to assume that the 80-120K range is used in both Kansas City, Ft. Lauderdale, and many other areas. Where folks land in that range of course is subject to a WHOLE LOT OF THINGS I talk about in this 2nd of a 3 part video series on compensation. Now let’s also assume that the company has done their due diligence re: COL (high, low and standard) and that range for those areas is pretty darn great.

Oh – but now we’re expanding in NYC…. and the market laughed at our range. More due diligence is done, and a new “premium” is established – the range for that same role, level, and job family is now 96-144K (a premium bump of 20%) and a midpoint of 120K in NYC.

Now someone moving from Boise has interviewed and been given the opportunity to select their next location. We’ll happily hire in KC or NYC – and we’re approved to make a stellar 1.05 CR offer! That would be 105K in KC, or 126K in NYC. Both offers (in our hypothetical yet fact based scenario) would be strong offers for the role, level and markets.

Of course cost of LIVING is a whole other personal topic and one job seekers should definitely consider before choosing which location / offer makes sense for them. I just ran these calculations this morning and y’all….

YIKES! Now there are a thousands of reasons why folks would prefer one location over another, and there are no “wrong” answers to your personal life choices – just what works best for you. For me, being a Midwest native who doesn’t particularly enjoy big cities, I’m taking KC all day long. The fact that I would have SO MUCH MORE buying power is an absolute plus.

I’ve seen cost of labor premiums average between 10-40% from the lowest to the highest. I’ve NEVER seen on at 69% and certainly not 189% – which is what folks would need to make to maintain the same standard of living AND keep up with housing costs.

Yet with all these FACTS – I’m still expected to believe that companies are wrong for having premium locations based on the cost of doing business in said locations?

But I digress. Let’s get into OPINIONS.

Folks had some strong opinions about my post. There is absolutely nothing wrong with hating this concept. I get that remote work has thrown some complications – and many orgs still honor whatever geographic ranges they’ve established. For example, a company is authorized to do business in every state east of the Mississippi – they’ll likely have a range established for the Eastern half of the US and maybe a “Virtual-NY” range for the higher COL areas. Is it “fair” to pay someone in Bentonville 105K and someone in Brooklyn 126K for the same role and level? I have no idea. But it can definitely be “factual”.

I find it fascinating and a little sad when people start losing their minds over these concepts. I was called rude, dismissive, told the recruiting org at my ENTIRE COMPANY was not “trustworthy” – all because I dared to speak FACTUALLY about how compensation is structured in many orgs.

Can you imagine? I mean even just writing it out I’m struck by how sad and hilarious that is. Being literally angry at a stranger you’ve never met because they dropped a FACT?

“But I don’t like it” – you’re entitled to that opinion

“It’s not fair” – you’re entitled to that opinion

“Companies should do this other thing instead” – also entitled to THAT opinion!

There’s nothing inherently WRONG with disliking the way this company or that operates. There’s nothing wrong with expressing those opinions, asking WHY, and making suggestions about how you’d like things to be.

There’s something VERY wrong with attacking the messenger because you don’t understand the difference between facts and opinions.

Interestingly, no one bothered to even ASK my opinion. Nope – they jumped straight to insults and accusations. At least a couple of people think I’m some sort of corporate bootlicker who supports suppressing wages. Because… I provided… factual…. information.

Here they are – the opinions NO ONE BOTHERED TO ASKED FOR.

  • Everyone deserves an opportunity to earn a living wage.
  • Compensation ranges and inputs used to determine offers should be fair and transparent.
  • Virtual compensation ranges need some inspection and explanation.
  • No single person, company, or team has this all figured out.
  • Taxes and inflation are too damn high.

Finally, I REALLY believe most recruiters who talk about these topics are genuinely doing our very best to provide insight and information to help job seekers navigate this stuff more effectively.

Oh and honorable mention to the assclown who went on a “liking” spree of all the comments attempting to hurt my feelings (lol as if I had any left) and who ALSO made a snarky comment about my “influencer” status. Imagine the hilarity that ensued when I went to check if we’d interacted previously (we’d been 1st level connections). I found an unread message from this individual… wait for it…. asking me to USE MY INFLUENCE to get eyeballs on one of his posts.

You can imagine how I responded to that.

Maybe It’s All Made Up

March 16, 2024 /

I know as well as most of you that there’s not shortage of clout chasers on social media.

I can’t assume that everything folks say on there is true. Especially when it flies directly in the face of common sense and compliance.

EVEN MORE ESPECIALLY when I know the players involved and can say with one million percent confidence 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒅𝒊𝒅𝒏’𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒆𝒏.

I have to work on letting go of things I can’t control and stay out of discussions that are not beneficial to me or my audience.

What I WILL continue to focus on is elevating my profession to the best of my abilities, working with my leaders to create fair and equitable job postings followed by a compliant hiring process, and make the best damn offers I can to folks who trust us with their careers.

The rest of the dopamine circus can three ring without me.

Before we go… let’s talk about my silly little tweet pictured above.

Here’s the problem – it’s widely reported that women apply to roles they meet ALL OR MOST of the qualifications for, and men will apply when only meeting some. I’ve even some statistics say women apply when they meet 100% of the requirements (logical) and men apply when they only meet 60%.

I know in MY world as a serious and sane recruiter who understands the definition of the word “required” – this simply means that men are going to get rejected more often. Too many times though folks interpret this to mean that women should ALSO shoot those long shots. Too many times what ACTUALLY happens is those well qualified women get passed over for someone’s frat bro or the CEO’s nephew.

If you’re a recruiter or hiring leader serious about increasing representation of under represented employees, let’s chat. Getting serious about what is ACTUALLY required and staying true to a fair and compliant process will get you there. Otherwise you’re at MAJOR risk of “going with your gut” – which doesn’t always work out for the very people you claim to care about. 🤷‍♀️

A Tale of Two Screenshots

March 10, 2024 /

I remember when one of my sons was in his teens – he was utterly convinced that society was “smarter” because of our near unlimited access to information. As internet connectivity becomes more widespread and literally ANYONE can post content, I disagree.

In many ways, access to whatever passes for “information” these days may be making us dumber.

Why yes I DO recognize the irony of saying this when I am myself one of those people putting information on the internet every week.

Recently a LinkedIn pal shared a gem of a video produced by a well known job board. The video is VERY well produced, with smooth transitions from the beautiful actress reading a script (she did great BTW) to visuals explaining what was being said. Speaking of visuals, let’s take a look at THIS screenshot from the video:

Here we see various steps in the recruiting workflow. The voiceover states “the ATS comes between Candidates apply and Applicants are screened”.

Read that again.

The ATS comes between “CANDIDATES APPLY and APPLICANTS ARE SCREENED”.

Now you may be wondering what’s the problem! Isn’t that how it works? It’s what everyone complains about. It’s what job seekers have been told repeatedly. I mean, who do I think I am to come in with… wait…. THIS:

Sadly I’m NOT an actress nor do I have access to fancy production tools and editing. All I have is an iPhone and a whiteboard. Oh, and 25 years of hands on recruiting experience across multiple organizations including a few FAANG companies. I’ve lost track of how many ATSs I’ve logged into every day for the past two decades. Here is MY visual of what an ATS actually does. Notice we’re covering the same topics:

  • Job is created
  • Job is posted online
  • Candidates apply
  • Applicants are screened
  • Candidates are interviewed
  • Candidate is hired

You might be wondering “Ames, what’s the problem?” Simple – ALL of those things happen within the ATS. And then some.

The digital filing cabinet doesn’t “come between” 2 specific workflows. It CONTAINS those workflows. I’ve talked about this on LinkedIn already. I completely understand that job seekers care the MOST (as they should) about where THEY are in process, and the only thing they can actually control – the information they provide via the application/resume.

So why does it matter? Why spend an hour on a lovely Sunday grabbing the screenshots, writing the blog, and screaming about ATSs into the abyss?

Partially because I have an allergic reaction to misinformation. Mostly, because the nonsensical rhetoric around hiring and recruiting actually harms job seekers.

I dislike that. Quite a bit, as it turns out.

Friends, you can choose who to follow, listen to, believe, and take advice from. It’s absolutely NONE of my business how you structure your job search. The difference between me and a lot of people talking about ATSs (especially incorrectly) is they often have something to sell. To be completely fair, I work for a company that uses this particular job board, with some solid success! They’re great at their core business – why they’re so willing to invest in and run with this flat out WRONG information is beyond me – it makes them look… kinda dumb. Just sayin.

For me, when anyone (company or individual) doubles down on incorrect or harmful information, we’re past a single data point. We’re now spotting trends – whether it’s endlessly repeating one wrong concept or repeated violations of common sense. Those trends help me determine where and when to spend my emotional (and actual) currency. It’s certainly not going to be with people and companies who are willfully misleading job seekers.

Do with that information what you will – and for more on what ATSs ACTUALLY DO, check out the playlist HERE.

The Old Gray Lady

February 20, 2024 /

And then there were two.

Our first family walk since we sent our Old Gray Lady across the rainbow bridge. On Monday 2/19 at 1:59 pm my sweet girl took her last breath this side of Heaven.

My sweet Abby Girl was a rescue. My little kids were around 2 and 4, and I decided I was ready for a dog and wanted them to grow up with one. We had nearly 17 years with this sweet old girl. She was well on her way to being a cranky old lady when her sisters came along but tolerated them well and taught them how to be the Goodest Girl.

Please enjoy a few of my favorite snaps from over the years. Abby gave us so much love and affection for longer than we could have ever hoped for. She enjoyed an entire bucket of chicken (her fave!) courtesy of the Colonel and several pieces of bacon too. As her breathing slowed I could feel the relief rolling off her. No more pain, now she’s running freely chasing all the chickens in Heaven.

Rest in Peace, sweet girl.

RECRUITER OUTREACH! Hey Recruiters! How’s YOUR Messaging?

May 26, 2023 /

Ok I’ll admit it. I’m guilting of SENDING this tired old message: 

“I came across your profile and was very impressed with your background! I’d love to talk to you about opportunities!”

Ugh. How embarrassing.

Here’s the thing recruiters. When we’re initiating contact, we have a responsibility for making the message worth responding to. Of course not all messages deserve (or will get) a response, and that’s ok! But we still need to at least put some effort in. 

The biggest challenge for many recruiters is balancing PERSONALIZATION with VOLUME. This is hard! I get it’s not always possible to spend tons of time on every single individual message. However, candidates don’t care about your volume problems. They care about getting messages meant for them that are worth replying to.

Instead of preaching at you about this, I’m going to tell you exactly how I do it.

Campaigns!

I actually do like automation when done correctly. I have a CRM that I can create “campaigns” in, meaning I can select candidates and start an email drip campaign. I can just set it and forget it, until I get a response – which then turns into a personalized recruiting process. I do it like this:

Start with a specific role

I don’t randomly reach out to people for coffee chats or just to hop on a call. I have stuff to do – most importantly, fill these damn reqs! If you’re getting an email from me, it’s because I think you might be a good fit for one of my open positions. By having a clear target, I can also share important stuff like compensation, location, and what makes the role cool (check out my pal Nic’s excellent post on this topic!)

So I have my list of folks I think might be good, and I will do small batches – maybe 10 at a time – so I can tweak the email to personalize a bit (who wants the same generic email EVERYBODY got? Boring!!) My first email goes something like this:

“Hi (prospect),

Amy from (Company), reaching out for the nefarious purposes of stealing you from your current job and convincing you to come do (cool stuff) here! I checked out your (resume, profile, blog, whatever) and thought there might be a fit based on (specific thing).

I don’t want to assume you’d be open to a change, but in case my timing is right, here’s a link to the role and (something cool, compensation, etc). You can learn more about (company, team, project) here (include link, articles, whatever).

Most importantly, I’d love to learn more about what kind of work lights you up, in case I have other positions now or in the future that might be worth talking about.  

You can reach me any time at (contact info) or feel free to book something directly at (calendar link). I look forward to connecting with you!

Me“

My goal here is to give enough information to actually act on, but also keep it short enough with a clear call to action that prospects can respond quickly if they want.

2nd Outreach

Ok maybe that wasn’t exciting enough for you. Or you missed it. Or just didn’t want to respond. Some candidates have actually told me they purposely wait for a 2nd or even 3rd email to make sure the recruiter is serious!! WHO KNEW?? So if the first email doesn’t get a response, number 2 goes something like this:

“Hi (prospect),

Hey there, following up on my email last week. I’d love to chat with you about a position I’m recruiting for – here’s the info (add job posting link, data included in first email) I sent – I’d love your feedback on it even if my timing is off!

We recently announced/shared (something cool), you can read about that here (include link or articles, depending on what you’re sharing)

If you’re open to hearing more, would love to connect live! You can reach me at (contact info) or book time whenever is convenient at (calendar link).

Thanks,

Me“

My goal here is to simply send a friendly reminder with an extra tidbit that may help convince someone to talk to me – or at least tell me no thanks. I’ll accept closure!

3rd & Final Outreach

Ok this is where I lose some recruiters. I am personally not interested in harassing people. I will send 3 emails, and if I get nothing back, I can take a hint. I have other prospects to move on to and I am not interested in wasting my time nor do I want to bug a prospect! It goes a little something like this:

Hey (prospect),

Just closing the loop with you. We’re still looking to hire for (role), but totally understand if my timing is off or the role just isn’t right for you at this stage of your career. If anything changes on your end please get in touch! If you know anyone in your network who might be interested in hearing about the role, please feel free to forward my info and I’m happy to share more!

Thanks for letting me invade your inbox – happy to connect in the future if you’re open.

Me”

I have a roughly 80% response rate to the 3rd email. That’s damn good for cold recruiter outreach.

I know some folks may think this is boring, or too focused on the role, but here’s my thought process. I’m trying to RECRUIT someone. They know it, I know it, why would I pretend this is anything but an attempt to get them in process with my company? Secondly, these are TEMPLATES – I fully expect anyone who wants to try this method to spice up their messages. My ACTUAL messages are a little funnier and include some cool stuff not shared here – give yourself permission to get creative!

Check out this week’s video HERE

RECRUITER OUTREACH! How Candidates Can Respond (without losing your mind)

May 19, 2023 /

We’ve all seen this tired old message:

“I came across your profile and was very impressed with your background! I’d love to talk to you about opportunities!”

Honestly y’all I catch MYSELF typing that some days and I immediately send myself to time out to think about what I’ve done.

Terrible. Terrible opener and I hate myself for sometimes starting with it.

Alrighty now that we have THAT covered, let’s get real. Some messages are going to be GREAT. Highly targeted, full of useful insights, and a clear call to action. Others, not so much – and it’s hard for job seekers to know which ones deserve a response!

Pro tip – not every message deserves a response.

The key takeaway here is deciding how much emotional energy you’re willing to invest in this conversation. Make no mistake job seekers – even subconsciously you’re investing! Taking the time to read the message. Considering your response. Picturing yourself interviewing. How life changing the role could be if you get an offer…. you know the feeling.

I want you to give yourself permission to NOT attend every conversation you’re invited to. Well intentioned recruiters may try to convince you that you should take EVERY call (especially THEIRS!) in the name of networking. To that, I say hell no. Protect your time, space, and energy. You’re going to need it for the REAL opportunities coming your way!

If the message gives you the necessary info (job description, compensation, location, etc) AND you’re interested, it’s perfectly ok to say so! If there’s not enough detail or you’re simply unsure how to respond? Here’s some templates you can use as a starting point to continuing the conversation.

Interested / open to work

Ideally, the message includes a clear call to action. It’s ok to simply acknowledge that and follow whatever guidance has been provided. If the message is not that clear, try something like this:

“Hi (Recruiter),

Thanks so much for reaching out! I am excited to learn more about (company) and (role). As an experienced (title), I’m actively searching for a role where I can (work you love). I’m open to (locations, titles, any relevant role related insights) with a target compensation of ($X).

I’m available for a call/interviews (availability). I look forward to connecting with you!

You“

Not interested but could be convinced

“Hi (Recruiter),

Thanks for reaching out. I’m not actively looking, but open to hearing about opportunities that may be significantly better than what I’m doing today. I’m currently a (title) where I (overview of work). I would be open to roles were I can (dream scope) in (location, hybrid, remote). In order to seriously consider a change, I would be looking for at least $X in total compensation.

If you have roles that align, I’d be happy to schedule a chat to learn more. Please send over more information about (job description, company, compensation) and I’ll get back to you right away.

Thanks,

You“

These templates are meant to be edited to reflect our own personal voice, wishlists, and expectations. It is critical that you understand your own job search boundaries. Many job seekers fall into the “all do anything!” trap and the reality is that can cause more harm than good. If you don’t have a target, how can you know where to aim? Take the time to really think about what you’re good at, where you could exchange that labor for money, and what that compensation needs to be to make sense for you. Don’t be afraid to take control of the conversation! You deserve nothing less.

Check out this week’s video HERE

Should Recruiters Read Every Resume? Part 2 – How To Do It!

May 12, 2023 /

Once again, full disclosure – I do not speak for every recruiter who ever existed. While my personal philosophy is that every direct applicant deserves fair consideration, I am well aware that there are crappy recruiters out there – some of them have actually left the industry and become coaches or thought leaders who like to brag about how they did their jobs poorly…. but that’s none of my business.

So what can recruiters DO when they’re overwhelmed by applicants with no end in sight?

First of all, some insight into how I have managed this throughout my career.

Job seekers and recruiters alike must understand that not every open position is bombarded with applications. Some may get thousands overnight. Others a few hundred… over weeks. There are as many variables as there are positions and companies – which is to say a metric sh!t ton. Job seekers need not worry about this – recruiters most definitely should.

I’ve worked in a variety of large and small companies working on highly specialized niche roles and entry level, high volume roles. My process for both (and everything in-between) can vary greatly depending on my workload, available tools/processes, and support. In those smaller companies (and even large companies when working on highly specialized roles) I just reviewed them all.

All of them. With my eyes. Usually in 10 seconds or less.

Here’s how that works: I dedicate the first hour or so of my day to cleaning up my applicant buckets. I literally block DAILY TIME to do exactly this part of my job – and it’s ultimately about 10-20% of my work week. I go into each requisition, review the basic qualifications and any notes I have so I am clear on my criteria, and do a quick pass. I can quickly move applicants to either clear yes or clear no piles. Yesses I come back for a more thorough review – nos I can get through in 10 seconds or less per resume. Here’s how. By doing this every single day, I’m usually able to keep up with applicant volume, which tends to slow down after a few days anyway.

But what about high volume roles?

Here are TWO specific, real world examples I lived at Google and Microsoft. Note this is based on my actual experience when working there – things may have changed, so verify with current recruiters if you’re curious.

High Volume Evergreen Reqs

Google posts “evergreen” roles – meaning positions that are intended to be a single entry point for multiple positions across various locations. I would work with my hiring managers to open internal roles, with specific criteria for our team. These reqs would be tied to an evergreen posting, and a Channels Specialist would review all those (millions) of incoming resumes then match them up to internal roles. Literally an entire team of screeners whose job was to review ALL incoming applications.

Boolean String Search

At Microsoft, we would do what we called a “boolean pull” – This was in an archaic old homegrown ATS called “e-rec” (we lovingly referred to as e-WRECK) – based on the needs of the role, I would hand my recruiting coordinator a basic boolean string, and they would run a search on everyone who met the criteria I set up. Those folks were pushed to “recruiter review” and I would look at the ones that were most likely qualified. Based on the results, I may still spot check the applications that weren’t pulled through, but it was very much directed by me as the lead recruiter – no bots! Shortly before I left Microsoft, we moved to iCIMS – once that ATS was in place we had KNOCKOUT QUESTIONS!! Woot!! These would be written by me, and I would configure the settings to disposition anyone who answered “no” to compliant, relevant, yes/no questions specific to the role I posted. While I could still spot check “rejected” applicants, I would normally find a good shortlist in the applicants that made it past this first screen.

Knockout Questions

I’ve already mentioned these, but they are a great and fair mechanism to help job seekers opt out. I realize that folks are going to insist on shooting their shot, and again – you’ve got the job search ammo to share? Knock yourself out. If you don’t meet the qualifications (or say no to those required questions) – we’re not going beyond your submittal. And lying on those questions? Well, those notes will live in the ATS long after you’ve and the recruiter have moved on… for me, not worth the risk.

So what’s a recruiter to do?

Inspect your req load

Do you have multiple positions for the same kind of talent? WHY are you posting the same position over and over again?? Look into a pooling or parent req which can compliantly be the “funnel” for multiple hiring reqs. By having a single entry point for applicants, you’re not bouncing around from role to role trying to catch up and undoubtedly reviewing duplicate submittals.

Set time constraints and realistic goals

Sorry recruiters, managing incoming applicants IS a critical part of your job. If you don’t want to do it? Don’t post roles. Go throw them in the hidden job market and give the rest of us a break. Carve out daily time (ideally) to heads down focus on clearing out your applicant buckets. This is time well spent – I promise.

Leverage compliant filters or knockout questions

There’s nothing inherently WRONG with these mechanisms, as long as applicants are getting fair consideration. See if your ATS is set up to allow for these options. It’s also ok to spot check your results to ensure not not missing great talent.

Remove postings

I mean it. If your roles are overwhelmed with applicants, take them down. TODAY. Get through the pipeline you have, and if you still haven’t hired (or built enough of a short list) you can post again. It’s absolutely ok to empty your cup before fill it up again.

Recruiters – if you’re still not sure how to dig out from your overwhelming workload, let’s set up some time! If you’re open to a coaching session with me, I will gladly talk through your concerns and see if we can get you some support or at the very least, some requests you can make of your leadership to solve these recruiter woes.

This week’s video available HERE.

Should Recruiters Read Every Resume? Part 1 – What Job Seekers Should Know

May 5, 2023 /

Ok so I may have made a strongly worded post about recruiters reviewing every resume.

Some of y’all were not pleased 😆

SO – I decided to tackle this topic once and for all! SHOULD recruiters read every resume? Eh…. maybe a skim. Brief review. But at the very least…

FAIR CONSIDERATION.

Now what does “fair consideration” look like? Honestly it can be different based on so many factors. What kinds of tools the recruiter has access to. Volume of roles and applications. Workload. Business needs. So. Many. Variables.

Next week we’ll tackle some of these in Part 2 focused on recruiters, but for this week, let’s talk about what job seekers should know.

Anecdotal data from years in the industry and talking to MANY recruiters has taught me that the number of “qualified” applicants is much smaller than the number of ACTUAL applicants. Most sources report somewhere between 10-25% on average are candidates that we can actually move forward with. One. In. Ten. At best? Maybe one in FOUR. Now you may ask yourself “gee if the odds are that bad, why bother looking at all??” Here’s why:

Several years ago I was working on a highly specialized role. This person was going to stand up a body of work that had literally never been done in this org before. The industry was one that had a high number of contractors, and so finding folks who would even consider full time (vs consulting) was already a challenge. Throw in a few other non-negotiables involving government contracts and I had myself a purple squirrel hunt.

At the time, I had an employee who was in charge of reviewing the resumes. Every week I would ask for a pipeline status, and every week it was “I’m searching – here’s a list of prospects” When asked about direct applicants, I was told there weren’t any good ones, and we’d never find someone who directly applied. After a painful offer decline and a few other near misses, I decided to check for myself.

Y’all. Why did I open my ATS to find 279 unveiwed applicants??

So I did what any annoyed recruiting leader would do. I poured myself a drink, turned on some reality TV, and got to work after hours. It took me about 2 hours, but I reviewed them all. Every single one. Yes, there were lots of immediate no’s. But there were also 10 highly qualified and INTERESTED applicants. That’s right – approximately 3% of the resumes I reviewed were worth forwarding to the hiring manager.

The HM decided to interview the top 5 (further scrutiny based on Preferred Qualifications) and we did final rounds with 4 of them. Thankfully we hired one of those applicants.

A stellar hire I would have completely missed had I not done my damn job and reviewed folks who had clearly indicated their interest in our role.

THAT is just one example of why I don’t sleep on applicants. Ever. Too much gold to be mined in that ATS y’all!

So what does this mean for job seekers? Two big things:

Let go of what you cannot confirm

You have no way of knowing how many applicants actually applied. Furthermore, you can’t know how many of those are even qualified. So don’t let high “applicant” counts on LinkedIn scare you away. That’s not even accurate data – let alone the smaller percentage of folks who can even be considered!

You ALSO have no way of knowing how the recruiter on the other end does their job. Do they rely on knockout questions? Do they trust their ranking system, or do they do a keyword search? Unless a recruiter tells you specifically this or that is how they operate? Don’t assume.

Let go of what you cannot control

There may be 100 other well qualified applicants. Can you do anything about it? The recruiter might suck at their job and leave your application to the whims of a shitty boolean string. Can you fix it? Nope. So why sweat it?

What you CAN control, is the information you put in front of the hiring team. Ideally your resume leave no doubt that you meet the qualifications and then some. If you run into clear “yes/no” required questions, there’s a very good possibility those are knockout questions – saying “no” may be a one way ticket to rejectionville. It MIGHT make sense to spend that precious job search energy on roles you’re fully qualified for.

You can ALSO engage with recruiters at your favorite companies on LinkedIn and other forms of social media. Unsure of how Company A does this or that? ASK SOMEONE! Don’t take bullshit “guidance” from cotton candy career coaches – go straight to the source and get the truth.

Not every recruiter has the bandwidth to reply to every message, but reading up on their careers pages, talking to friends/colleagues who work at those companies and following the hiring authorities on social media will get you a lot further than stressing over what you can’t confirm – or control.

Check out this week’s video HERE

Should You Research Your Interviewers?

April 14, 2023 /

Like most answers in recruiting, “it depends”. This may be very important in smaller companies. In larger companies, they may have whole policies around not sharing interviewer names SPECIFICALLY so you don’t get caught up researching the people you’re meeting with.

My number one recommendation is to check with your recruiter on what’s expected and/or BENEFICIAL for you to study up on before you interview.

I haven’t personally worked for a company where researching your interviewer ultimately made a difference. Sure it’s helpful to know some basics about the person you’re meeting with – more importantly, what areas or role related competencies will they cover with you? But knowing if you both like chocolate pudding? Eh… not so much.

Why? CONFIRMATION BIAS.

Let’s say you and the interviewer went to the same college. Interesting! You could certainly discuss your team’s football record, or your true feelings about your alma mater’s mascot. Do these things have ANYTHING to do with your ability to do the job? Nope.

As for me, I’d rather a level playing field where I’m judge on my ability to perform in the role based on my skills and background and NOT on the fact that we’re both Geminis who drive Jettas.

Ok maybe that’s a little hyperbole… but hopefully you get where I’m going with this.

IF you are going to research your interviewers, make sure you’re focusing on role related content and as much insight as you can get about the actual interview process.

Have you researched your interviewers before? How did it go? Let us know in the comments!

Check out this week’s video HERE

What Does Your Social Media Content Say About You?

April 7, 2023 /

This might sting a little.

Now I say this as someone who is pretty darn transparent on social media… I’m far from the example anyone should be following! That said – I am a recruiter, and I read profiles for a living (along with some other stuff 😉 ) So what is an active job seeker to do? Now this is not your profile – we have another video about that you can check out HERE. We’re talking about posts, comments, and engagement.

Get ready for some very loving truth bombs…

Truth Bomb #1 – Your posts are incredibly vague

You’ve seen them – “don’t ignore my post!” or “I need a job!” Well, yes. I believe those things are true. Unfortunately a lot of those posts don’t say much else. They often lack context or a clear call to action – so what’s a reader to do? Unfortunately a lot of readers will make comments like “you got this!” or the dreaded “commenting for reach!” but seriously…. does that actually get you anywhere?

Truth Bomb #2 – your post is about YOU, not how you solve THEIR problem

This one sucks. I want you to think about this though – there’s a difference between “I need” and “I can do”. One is self-serving, the other is value adding to the audience. The reality is a stranger on the internet doesn’t care if you’re about to be homeless. YOU care, hence your content asking for help. The readers of your content? Not so much. They have their own wishes/needs/agenda, and if you speak to that, you’re way ahead of your competition. Instead of “I need a job” try “I am excited to land my next role where I can provide X by doing Y” or something to that effect.

Truth Bomb #3 – you need a talent shaped box

Another tough one – so many folks are hesitant to get too specific. If I post about how great of a recruiter I am, and that I’m really good at sourcing engineers, no one will consider me for a marketing gig! Well… that may be true… but are you QUALIFIED for a marketing gig? It’s absolutely ok to consider a career change – and your content should speak to that. The reality is the more targeted and specific your pitch is, the more likely it’ll get noticed by the right people!

The goal is to create a mental picture of how you can solve someone’s problem. Companies hire people to DO things. Buy, sell, build, consult, influence, direct, manager, manufacture… you name it. Show you can do that thing, and watch your engagement go up.

Check out the video HERE.

« Older posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

© 2024 Recruiting In Yoga Pants

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑