Dressing up is for suckers

Category: job boards

A Tale of Two Screenshots

I remember when one of my sons was in his teens – he was utterly convinced that society was “smarter” because of our near unlimited access to information. As internet connectivity becomes more widespread and literally ANYONE can post content, I disagree.

In many ways, access to whatever passes for “information” these days may be making us dumber.

Why yes I DO recognize the irony of saying this when I am myself one of those people putting information on the internet every week.

Recently a LinkedIn pal shared a gem of a video produced by a well known job board. The video is VERY well produced, with smooth transitions from the beautiful actress reading a script (she did great BTW) to visuals explaining what was being said. Speaking of visuals, let’s take a look at THIS screenshot from the video:

Here we see various steps in the recruiting workflow. The voiceover states “the ATS comes between Candidates apply and Applicants are screened”.

Read that again.

The ATS comes between “CANDIDATES APPLY and APPLICANTS ARE SCREENED”.

Now you may be wondering what’s the problem! Isn’t that how it works? It’s what everyone complains about. It’s what job seekers have been told repeatedly. I mean, who do I think I am to come in with… wait…. THIS:

Sadly I’m NOT an actress nor do I have access to fancy production tools and editing. All I have is an iPhone and a whiteboard. Oh, and 25 years of hands on recruiting experience across multiple organizations including a few FAANG companies. I’ve lost track of how many ATSs I’ve logged into every day for the past two decades. Here is MY visual of what an ATS actually does. Notice we’re covering the same topics:

  • Job is created
  • Job is posted online
  • Candidates apply
  • Applicants are screened
  • Candidates are interviewed
  • Candidate is hired

You might be wondering “Ames, what’s the problem?” Simple – ALL of those things happen within the ATS. And then some.

The digital filing cabinet doesn’t “come between” 2 specific workflows. It CONTAINS those workflows. I’ve talked about this on LinkedIn already. I completely understand that job seekers care the MOST (as they should) about where THEY are in process, and the only thing they can actually control – the information they provide via the application/resume.

So why does it matter? Why spend an hour on a lovely Sunday grabbing the screenshots, writing the blog, and screaming about ATSs into the abyss?

Partially because I have an allergic reaction to misinformation. Mostly, because the nonsensical rhetoric around hiring and recruiting actually harms job seekers.

I dislike that. Quite a bit, as it turns out.

Friends, you can choose who to follow, listen to, believe, and take advice from. It’s absolutely NONE of my business how you structure your job search. The difference between me and a lot of people talking about ATSs (especially incorrectly) is they often have something to sell. To be completely fair, I work for a company that uses this particular job board, with some solid success! They’re great at their core business – why they’re so willing to invest in and run with this flat out WRONG information is beyond me – it makes them look… kinda dumb. Just sayin.

For me, when anyone (company or individual) doubles down on incorrect or harmful information, we’re past a single data point. We’re now spotting trends – whether it’s endlessly repeating one wrong concept or repeated violations of common sense. Those trends help me determine where and when to spend my emotional (and actual) currency. It’s certainly not going to be with people and companies who are willfully misleading job seekers.

Do with that information what you will – and for more on what ATSs ACTUALLY DO, check out the playlist HERE.

Should Recruiters Read Every Resume? Part 2 – How To Do It!

Once again, full disclosure – I do not speak for every recruiter who ever existed. While my personal philosophy is that every direct applicant deserves fair consideration, I am well aware that there are crappy recruiters out there – some of them have actually left the industry and become coaches or thought leaders who like to brag about how they did their jobs poorly…. but that’s none of my business.

So what can recruiters DO when they’re overwhelmed by applicants with no end in sight?

First of all, some insight into how I have managed this throughout my career.

Job seekers and recruiters alike must understand that not every open position is bombarded with applications. Some may get thousands overnight. Others a few hundred… over weeks. There are as many variables as there are positions and companies – which is to say a metric sh!t ton. Job seekers need not worry about this – recruiters most definitely should.

I’ve worked in a variety of large and small companies working on highly specialized niche roles and entry level, high volume roles. My process for both (and everything in-between) can vary greatly depending on my workload, available tools/processes, and support. In those smaller companies (and even large companies when working on highly specialized roles) I just reviewed them all.

All of them. With my eyes. Usually in 10 seconds or less.

Here’s how that works: I dedicate the first hour or so of my day to cleaning up my applicant buckets. I literally block DAILY TIME to do exactly this part of my job – and it’s ultimately about 10-20% of my work week. I go into each requisition, review the basic qualifications and any notes I have so I am clear on my criteria, and do a quick pass. I can quickly move applicants to either clear yes or clear no piles. Yesses I come back for a more thorough review – nos I can get through in 10 seconds or less per resume. Here’s how. By doing this every single day, I’m usually able to keep up with applicant volume, which tends to slow down after a few days anyway.

But what about high volume roles?

Here are TWO specific, real world examples I lived at Google and Microsoft. Note this is based on my actual experience when working there – things may have changed, so verify with current recruiters if you’re curious.

High Volume Evergreen Reqs

Google posts “evergreen” roles – meaning positions that are intended to be a single entry point for multiple positions across various locations. I would work with my hiring managers to open internal roles, with specific criteria for our team. These reqs would be tied to an evergreen posting, and a Channels Specialist would review all those (millions) of incoming resumes then match them up to internal roles. Literally an entire team of screeners whose job was to review ALL incoming applications.

Boolean String Search

At Microsoft, we would do what we called a “boolean pull” – This was in an archaic old homegrown ATS called “e-rec” (we lovingly referred to as e-WRECK) – based on the needs of the role, I would hand my recruiting coordinator a basic boolean string, and they would run a search on everyone who met the criteria I set up. Those folks were pushed to “recruiter review” and I would look at the ones that were most likely qualified. Based on the results, I may still spot check the applications that weren’t pulled through, but it was very much directed by me as the lead recruiter – no bots! Shortly before I left Microsoft, we moved to iCIMS – once that ATS was in place we had KNOCKOUT QUESTIONS!! Woot!! These would be written by me, and I would configure the settings to disposition anyone who answered “no” to compliant, relevant, yes/no questions specific to the role I posted. While I could still spot check “rejected” applicants, I would normally find a good shortlist in the applicants that made it past this first screen.

Knockout Questions

I’ve already mentioned these, but they are a great and fair mechanism to help job seekers opt out. I realize that folks are going to insist on shooting their shot, and again – you’ve got the job search ammo to share? Knock yourself out. If you don’t meet the qualifications (or say no to those required questions) – we’re not going beyond your submittal. And lying on those questions? Well, those notes will live in the ATS long after you’ve and the recruiter have moved on… for me, not worth the risk.

So what’s a recruiter to do?

Inspect your req load

Do you have multiple positions for the same kind of talent? WHY are you posting the same position over and over again?? Look into a pooling or parent req which can compliantly be the “funnel” for multiple hiring reqs. By having a single entry point for applicants, you’re not bouncing around from role to role trying to catch up and undoubtedly reviewing duplicate submittals.

Set time constraints and realistic goals

Sorry recruiters, managing incoming applicants IS a critical part of your job. If you don’t want to do it? Don’t post roles. Go throw them in the hidden job market and give the rest of us a break. Carve out daily time (ideally) to heads down focus on clearing out your applicant buckets. This is time well spent – I promise.

Leverage compliant filters or knockout questions

There’s nothing inherently WRONG with these mechanisms, as long as applicants are getting fair consideration. See if your ATS is set up to allow for these options. It’s also ok to spot check your results to ensure not not missing great talent.

Remove postings

I mean it. If your roles are overwhelmed with applicants, take them down. TODAY. Get through the pipeline you have, and if you still haven’t hired (or built enough of a short list) you can post again. It’s absolutely ok to empty your cup before fill it up again.

Recruiters – if you’re still not sure how to dig out from your overwhelming workload, let’s set up some time! If you’re open to a coaching session with me, I will gladly talk through your concerns and see if we can get you some support or at the very least, some requests you can make of your leadership to solve these recruiter woes.

This week’s video available HERE.

Applying Through 3rd Party Sites!

We love an easy button don’t we?

Applying through a one-click / easy apply / mass application type site may SEEM like a good idea, but what happens on the backend of that process?

So for me, I’m ALWAYS going to go straight to the company’s careers page. Sorry LinkedIn – love ya but not going to apply through ya. I want to go STRAIGHT to the hiring company, carefully upload my information, make sure my resume parsed correctly. You’re going to see EXACTLY what I want you to see from me and I’m taking NO chances!

But I am crazy suspicious like that. If you’re not, and you want to take your chances with one of these sites, read on!

I investigated LinkedIn, Zip Recruiter, and Indeed to better understand HOW those applications are managed. The results, NOT surprising in the least! In fact, these sites operate exactly how I had hoped.

All three sites allow the job poster (typically a recruiter) to set up specific criteria in order to be moved through the process. This can your typical Yes/No decision tree type questions, or even assessments! Based on the job seeker’s response to those questions, an applicant can be “automatically” dispositioned. So what does THAT mean?!

For Indeed, your application is “Rejected”. In Zip Recruiter, it’s “Hidden”. LinkedIn? You’ve been “Archived”.

Do you know what all three of those statuses have in common?

The list of applicants is still READILY AVAILABLE AND VIEWABLE to the employer! Many recruiters will go back into those lists and double check candidates for mistakes or even fit for other roles.

Just like we do in traditional ATSs. It’s even possible to “unhide” or whatever to bring that candidate back to the main workflow.

These sites can be particularly useful for small companies that can’t afford a big box ATS, or don’t hire often enough to set up their own. Once again, the SYSTEM being used to TRACK APPLICANTS functions exactly as expected. It’s a digital filing cabinet, following the instructions given to it by the user – typically a recruiter.

Don’t let yourself get weirded out or scared by these scam artists masquerading as “job search coaches”. You don’t need to pull the tiny white font crap, no need to “bypass” applications, or throw yourself on the mercy of your network. Targeted, relevant applications coupled with strategic networking is your best bet.

For more on this topic, watch the video HERE

There’s a sucker born every minute. Some go into recruiting.

1997. I was attending a vocational school night classes in Lacey, WA (since bankrupt) in an attempt to learn how to type and be a receptionist. I had two little babies at home and I knew I need to get some training and make some money. Natalie (I can’t remember her last name) was the branch manager of our local Office Team. She came to speak with all of us students about “temping”, why we should consider signing up with Office Team after our training and we knew how to answer phones and file documents. She stood there in her branch manager suit, all polished and professional, and I knew in that moment – I wanted to be Natalie when I grew up.

So began my path to recruiting.

I signed to be a temp for Office Team, and spent several weeks covering the front desk while their receptionist was on parental leave. When I was offered a role as a Staffing Manager, I couldn’t run away fast enough. All the Staffing Managers I worked with went home crying every day – no way in hell I was signing up for that. Fast forward a few more months and I somehow networked my way into a recruiting gig for a local boutique firm hiring truck drivers. Thus began my recruiting career.

Twenty years later, I’m living the good life as a senior recruiter for a well known tech brand. I’ve learned SO much over the years, the most important lesson is that I’m actually really good at this. I often joke that I’ve been in recruiting so long that I literally cannot do anything else. Probably true, but besides the point.

In all my years I’ve seen disruptive new models come and go. There was the company that offered to pay you to speak to recruiters (it’s ok they’re working on a relaunch). The latest is a firm that is going to do some cool stuff with blockchain and prepaid visas. I listened to the amazing Chad and Cheese Podcast about this today and there was a reference to “Equifax for Resumes” which frankly freaked me the hell out.

Am I in a Black Mirror episode??

Y’all can read the posts and listen to the podcasts yourselves, but let me just say this – ALL of this seems to hinge on the willingness of job seekers to be, well, seeking a job. There’s also apparently a claim that the 5% fee received by the JOB SEEKER is enough for a so called passive individual to make a change. There’s also some discussion about how staffing agencies can actual leverage this tool – which is FASCINATING since the early premise seemed to be that staffing agencies suck or something (my words not theirs, simmer down internet folk).

Alrighty. All that, leading up to THIS – Turn Recruitment Into a Second Income.

leo dicaprio GIF

I’m CRYING, y’all.

So the basic premise (maybe?) is that you can do this really hard work on the side and by leveraging the fine folks behind this shiny new tool, make some side money. After all, You go and get a job requirement from a company, agree to your terms with them at a 20% fee.

That’s all! Just go get a job requirement. From a company. Get them to agree to your terms at 20% fee.

Easy peasy.

Sure, working with this outfit reduces your fee, but they also remove all the risk and challenges recruiters face and skip right to the money making part (absolutely THEIR words this time, y’all. You can’t make this shit up).

I gotta tell you my emotions are all over the place with this. I went from being mildly amused to pissed off to confused and now am squarely in the sit back and pop some popcorn camp. I think recruiting is BIG ENOUGH for all kinds of people to try all sorts of neat things and make great money doing it. What I DON’T like is anyone reducing my hard work to a simple transaction.

In a phrase, F*CK OFF.

I work REALLY hard to engage people who otherwise wouldn’t consider a job change. I consult all the time with managers, convincing them to take chances on people who may not look “right” on paper.  I constantly peel back the layers to understand the emotional currency of my candidates, and try to help them navigate the really hard, complex interview process at my company. I GIVE A SHIT about my clients and candidates. I did at my last several companies. I’ll do it again at the next one.

If you think you can distill all that hard emotional heavy lifting into signing up for a f*cking job board you don’t know recruitment.

Now – if your premise (which is what I took away from the podcast) is that you’re a supplement to recruiting firms / TA teams, that’s cool. But that’s not your premise, right…? You LITERALLY POSTED that recruiting is basically driving around and picking people up in your car.

To the founders, executives, writers, anyone involved that wants to discuss – let’s do it. Amy@recruitinginyogapants.com. I’m open to a conversation – I’ll give you my personal cell phone and we can talk all about it. We could even meet on the Recruiting Animal Show. Let’s talk about how I can make great money with no qualification. Surely you didn’t mean it to come across the way it did…

Right?