Recruiting In Yoga Pants

Dressing up is for suckers

Category: recruiters (Page 1 of 2)

RECRUITER OUTREACH! How Candidates Can Respond (without losing your mind)

May 19, 2023 /

We’ve all seen this tired old message:

“I came across your profile and was very impressed with your background! I’d love to talk to you about opportunities!”

Honestly y’all I catch MYSELF typing that some days and I immediately send myself to time out to think about what I’ve done.

Terrible. Terrible opener and I hate myself for sometimes starting with it.

Alrighty now that we have THAT covered, let’s get real. Some messages are going to be GREAT. Highly targeted, full of useful insights, and a clear call to action. Others, not so much – and it’s hard for job seekers to know which ones deserve a response!

Pro tip – not every message deserves a response.

The key takeaway here is deciding how much emotional energy you’re willing to invest in this conversation. Make no mistake job seekers – even subconsciously you’re investing! Taking the time to read the message. Considering your response. Picturing yourself interviewing. How life changing the role could be if you get an offer…. you know the feeling.

I want you to give yourself permission to NOT attend every conversation you’re invited to. Well intentioned recruiters may try to convince you that you should take EVERY call (especially THEIRS!) in the name of networking. To that, I say hell no. Protect your time, space, and energy. You’re going to need it for the REAL opportunities coming your way!

If the message gives you the necessary info (job description, compensation, location, etc) AND you’re interested, it’s perfectly ok to say so! If there’s not enough detail or you’re simply unsure how to respond? Here’s some templates you can use as a starting point to continuing the conversation.

Interested / open to work

Ideally, the message includes a clear call to action. It’s ok to simply acknowledge that and follow whatever guidance has been provided. If the message is not that clear, try something like this:

“Hi (Recruiter),

Thanks so much for reaching out! I am excited to learn more about (company) and (role). As an experienced (title), I’m actively searching for a role where I can (work you love). I’m open to (locations, titles, any relevant role related insights) with a target compensation of ($X).

I’m available for a call/interviews (availability). I look forward to connecting with you!

You“

Not interested but could be convinced

“Hi (Recruiter),

Thanks for reaching out. I’m not actively looking, but open to hearing about opportunities that may be significantly better than what I’m doing today. I’m currently a (title) where I (overview of work). I would be open to roles were I can (dream scope) in (location, hybrid, remote). In order to seriously consider a change, I would be looking for at least $X in total compensation.

If you have roles that align, I’d be happy to schedule a chat to learn more. Please send over more information about (job description, company, compensation) and I’ll get back to you right away.

Thanks,

You“

These templates are meant to be edited to reflect our own personal voice, wishlists, and expectations. It is critical that you understand your own job search boundaries. Many job seekers fall into the “all do anything!” trap and the reality is that can cause more harm than good. If you don’t have a target, how can you know where to aim? Take the time to really think about what you’re good at, where you could exchange that labor for money, and what that compensation needs to be to make sense for you. Don’t be afraid to take control of the conversation! You deserve nothing less.

Check out this week’s video HERE

Should Recruiters Read Every Resume? Part 2 – How To Do It!

May 12, 2023 /

Once again, full disclosure – I do not speak for every recruiter who ever existed. While my personal philosophy is that every direct applicant deserves fair consideration, I am well aware that there are crappy recruiters out there – some of them have actually left the industry and become coaches or thought leaders who like to brag about how they did their jobs poorly…. but that’s none of my business.

So what can recruiters DO when they’re overwhelmed by applicants with no end in sight?

First of all, some insight into how I have managed this throughout my career.

Job seekers and recruiters alike must understand that not every open position is bombarded with applications. Some may get thousands overnight. Others a few hundred… over weeks. There are as many variables as there are positions and companies – which is to say a metric sh!t ton. Job seekers need not worry about this – recruiters most definitely should.

I’ve worked in a variety of large and small companies working on highly specialized niche roles and entry level, high volume roles. My process for both (and everything in-between) can vary greatly depending on my workload, available tools/processes, and support. In those smaller companies (and even large companies when working on highly specialized roles) I just reviewed them all.

All of them. With my eyes. Usually in 10 seconds or less.

Here’s how that works: I dedicate the first hour or so of my day to cleaning up my applicant buckets. I literally block DAILY TIME to do exactly this part of my job – and it’s ultimately about 10-20% of my work week. I go into each requisition, review the basic qualifications and any notes I have so I am clear on my criteria, and do a quick pass. I can quickly move applicants to either clear yes or clear no piles. Yesses I come back for a more thorough review – nos I can get through in 10 seconds or less per resume. Here’s how. By doing this every single day, I’m usually able to keep up with applicant volume, which tends to slow down after a few days anyway.

But what about high volume roles?

Here are TWO specific, real world examples I lived at Google and Microsoft. Note this is based on my actual experience when working there – things may have changed, so verify with current recruiters if you’re curious.

High Volume Evergreen Reqs

Google posts “evergreen” roles – meaning positions that are intended to be a single entry point for multiple positions across various locations. I would work with my hiring managers to open internal roles, with specific criteria for our team. These reqs would be tied to an evergreen posting, and a Channels Specialist would review all those (millions) of incoming resumes then match them up to internal roles. Literally an entire team of screeners whose job was to review ALL incoming applications.

Boolean String Search

At Microsoft, we would do what we called a “boolean pull” – This was in an archaic old homegrown ATS called “e-rec” (we lovingly referred to as e-WRECK) – based on the needs of the role, I would hand my recruiting coordinator a basic boolean string, and they would run a search on everyone who met the criteria I set up. Those folks were pushed to “recruiter review” and I would look at the ones that were most likely qualified. Based on the results, I may still spot check the applications that weren’t pulled through, but it was very much directed by me as the lead recruiter – no bots! Shortly before I left Microsoft, we moved to iCIMS – once that ATS was in place we had KNOCKOUT QUESTIONS!! Woot!! These would be written by me, and I would configure the settings to disposition anyone who answered “no” to compliant, relevant, yes/no questions specific to the role I posted. While I could still spot check “rejected” applicants, I would normally find a good shortlist in the applicants that made it past this first screen.

Knockout Questions

I’ve already mentioned these, but they are a great and fair mechanism to help job seekers opt out. I realize that folks are going to insist on shooting their shot, and again – you’ve got the job search ammo to share? Knock yourself out. If you don’t meet the qualifications (or say no to those required questions) – we’re not going beyond your submittal. And lying on those questions? Well, those notes will live in the ATS long after you’ve and the recruiter have moved on… for me, not worth the risk.

So what’s a recruiter to do?

Inspect your req load

Do you have multiple positions for the same kind of talent? WHY are you posting the same position over and over again?? Look into a pooling or parent req which can compliantly be the “funnel” for multiple hiring reqs. By having a single entry point for applicants, you’re not bouncing around from role to role trying to catch up and undoubtedly reviewing duplicate submittals.

Set time constraints and realistic goals

Sorry recruiters, managing incoming applicants IS a critical part of your job. If you don’t want to do it? Don’t post roles. Go throw them in the hidden job market and give the rest of us a break. Carve out daily time (ideally) to heads down focus on clearing out your applicant buckets. This is time well spent – I promise.

Leverage compliant filters or knockout questions

There’s nothing inherently WRONG with these mechanisms, as long as applicants are getting fair consideration. See if your ATS is set up to allow for these options. It’s also ok to spot check your results to ensure not not missing great talent.

Remove postings

I mean it. If your roles are overwhelmed with applicants, take them down. TODAY. Get through the pipeline you have, and if you still haven’t hired (or built enough of a short list) you can post again. It’s absolutely ok to empty your cup before fill it up again.

Recruiters – if you’re still not sure how to dig out from your overwhelming workload, let’s set up some time! If you’re open to a coaching session with me, I will gladly talk through your concerns and see if we can get you some support or at the very least, some requests you can make of your leadership to solve these recruiter woes.

This week’s video available HERE.

Should Recruiters Read Every Resume? Part 1 – What Job Seekers Should Know

May 5, 2023 /

Ok so I may have made a strongly worded post about recruiters reviewing every resume.

Some of y’all were not pleased 😆

SO – I decided to tackle this topic once and for all! SHOULD recruiters read every resume? Eh…. maybe a skim. Brief review. But at the very least…

FAIR CONSIDERATION.

Now what does “fair consideration” look like? Honestly it can be different based on so many factors. What kinds of tools the recruiter has access to. Volume of roles and applications. Workload. Business needs. So. Many. Variables.

Next week we’ll tackle some of these in Part 2 focused on recruiters, but for this week, let’s talk about what job seekers should know.

Anecdotal data from years in the industry and talking to MANY recruiters has taught me that the number of “qualified” applicants is much smaller than the number of ACTUAL applicants. Most sources report somewhere between 10-25% on average are candidates that we can actually move forward with. One. In. Ten. At best? Maybe one in FOUR. Now you may ask yourself “gee if the odds are that bad, why bother looking at all??” Here’s why:

Several years ago I was working on a highly specialized role. This person was going to stand up a body of work that had literally never been done in this org before. The industry was one that had a high number of contractors, and so finding folks who would even consider full time (vs consulting) was already a challenge. Throw in a few other non-negotiables involving government contracts and I had myself a purple squirrel hunt.

At the time, I had an employee who was in charge of reviewing the resumes. Every week I would ask for a pipeline status, and every week it was “I’m searching – here’s a list of prospects” When asked about direct applicants, I was told there weren’t any good ones, and we’d never find someone who directly applied. After a painful offer decline and a few other near misses, I decided to check for myself.

Y’all. Why did I open my ATS to find 279 unveiwed applicants??

So I did what any annoyed recruiting leader would do. I poured myself a drink, turned on some reality TV, and got to work after hours. It took me about 2 hours, but I reviewed them all. Every single one. Yes, there were lots of immediate no’s. But there were also 10 highly qualified and INTERESTED applicants. That’s right – approximately 3% of the resumes I reviewed were worth forwarding to the hiring manager.

The HM decided to interview the top 5 (further scrutiny based on Preferred Qualifications) and we did final rounds with 4 of them. Thankfully we hired one of those applicants.

A stellar hire I would have completely missed had I not done my damn job and reviewed folks who had clearly indicated their interest in our role.

THAT is just one example of why I don’t sleep on applicants. Ever. Too much gold to be mined in that ATS y’all!

So what does this mean for job seekers? Two big things:

Let go of what you cannot confirm

You have no way of knowing how many applicants actually applied. Furthermore, you can’t know how many of those are even qualified. So don’t let high “applicant” counts on LinkedIn scare you away. That’s not even accurate data – let alone the smaller percentage of folks who can even be considered!

You ALSO have no way of knowing how the recruiter on the other end does their job. Do they rely on knockout questions? Do they trust their ranking system, or do they do a keyword search? Unless a recruiter tells you specifically this or that is how they operate? Don’t assume.

Let go of what you cannot control

There may be 100 other well qualified applicants. Can you do anything about it? The recruiter might suck at their job and leave your application to the whims of a shitty boolean string. Can you fix it? Nope. So why sweat it?

What you CAN control, is the information you put in front of the hiring team. Ideally your resume leave no doubt that you meet the qualifications and then some. If you run into clear “yes/no” required questions, there’s a very good possibility those are knockout questions – saying “no” may be a one way ticket to rejectionville. It MIGHT make sense to spend that precious job search energy on roles you’re fully qualified for.

You can ALSO engage with recruiters at your favorite companies on LinkedIn and other forms of social media. Unsure of how Company A does this or that? ASK SOMEONE! Don’t take bullshit “guidance” from cotton candy career coaches – go straight to the source and get the truth.

Not every recruiter has the bandwidth to reply to every message, but reading up on their careers pages, talking to friends/colleagues who work at those companies and following the hiring authorities on social media will get you a lot further than stressing over what you can’t confirm – or control.

Check out this week’s video HERE

Resume & Job Search Advice – Who Do You Trust?

March 10, 2023 /

This can be tricky.

I’ll be the first to admit that it can be very difficult to know who to believe. A common complaint from job seekers is there is no single “right” way to do… well… any of this.

Let’s take resumes for example. This recruiter said 1 page only. That recruiter says PDF only. And another random recruiter is picky about font size.

Sigh. I’m exhausted just thinking about it.

Here’s the thing though – there is no universal standard to MOST of this. I’d like to think we can all agree that clean, concise, and clear accomplishments are key. So what’s a job seeker to do?

Relevant Advice

Let’s face it – not all advice on the internet is meant for you. And that’s ok! Even in my recruiting world, I’m pivoting from engineering to high volume production hiring. The advice I give MY candidates will shift greatly – because it’s a very different skill set with a different set of expectations, resume guidance, and interview best practices. Make sure you’re asking questions (and following the guidance of) people who actually KNOW what you’re trying to learn – and can help you get there.

Trusted Sources

Before you take advice from ANYONE, you should vet them! If we’re talking resume advice, recruiters are often a great source for feedback because they are ultimately your audience. Don’t you want to know what the person responsible for reading your resume wants to see? Career coaches and resume writers can also be great – but are they familiar with your particular industry, seniority, and skill set? Like recruiters, coaches and writers can be generalists too – but are they knowledgable about the companies and industries you want to work in? Do they have the trust of recruiters and hiring leaders? Are they trusted or even recommended by recruiters (check out my list here).

Ultimately, you have the responsibility and opportunity to decide what’s best for you. YES, there’s lot of advice out there – and lots of self-proclaimed experts that have perfected the manipulation game and only want to get their hands on your hard earned money. Some services (if it’s affordable for you) can be worth every penny. Sometimes you just need to focus on QUALITY advice, and stop trying to listen to everyone.

For more on this topic, watch this week’s video HERE.

Can A Recruiter BLACKLIST A Candidate?

December 2, 2022 /

Y’all.

I’ve seen some recruiters say some pretty crazy stuff in the last couple of decades, but the idea that we (they) can actually BLACKLIST someone is… well. a bit out there for me.

Let me explain – but first let’s unpack the definition of “blacklist”

Alrighty! So CAN recruiters “blacklist”? Not necessarily… but what could happen:

Recruiters can record specific, actual conversations or communications that happen between recruiter/hm and candidate. So – if you cuss out a recruiter it’s quite likely that will be documented in the ATS and recorded for future recruiters to read.

Of course recruiters ALSO have the authority to decide who they want to work with and submit to hiring managers. It would be VERY UNETHICAL to not submit a candidate solely because you don’t like them. It would be REASONABLE to not submit a candidate because of repeated or highly problematic behaviors.

I don’t say any of this to freak people out. MOST recruiters are fair, realistic, and understand the difference between data points (had a bad day) and trends (consistently inappropriate or poor behavior).

Finally, if a recruiter is recording personal biases or making decisions based on anything OTHER than fit for the role / verifiable data points, it can reflect very badly on THEM.

Bottom line – NO – recruiters typically do not have the authority or influence to “blacklist” anyone for any reason – but they can definitely track factual data and let the actual hiring authority (typically hiring managers) decide for themselves.

The Golden Rule – treat others how you want to be treated – is always a best practice no matter what side of hiring you’re on.

Recruiter Accountability! Recruiting Manager Edition

November 4, 2022 /

That’s right folks – many (most?) recruiters actually report to someone.

Now this obviously doesn’t include consultants, or independent recruiters. Anyone on a W-2 (employed by a company) and even some agency folks on contract or 1099 type work still report to someone! And that person is often a Recruiting Manager (RM).

The hierarchy can vary widely org to org – some recruiters roll up to the larger HR organization, some are defined by kind of recruiter (closers vs sourcers, for example). The one thing they all have in common? They’re bound by metrics and manager expectations.

One of the most common expectations is number of hires. That’s right – recruiters will typically have a specific deliverable or expectation of output – if we’re not making those numbers, we’ve got some ‘splaining to do! (Tell me more about recruiters NOT wanting to hire people. Seriously. Because if we don’t… well….)

THOSE numbers are of course fluid depending on the organization, kind of hiring we’re responsible for, things like that. For a senior tech recruiter working on niche roles, it may be 2 hires a month. For my high volume friends, it can be 10 times that amount or more.

RMs are often involved in STRATEGY discussions as well – working with business leaders to understand hiring goals for the year, partnering with their recruiting teams to help define how we’re going to get there – RMs are involved in those discussions as well. This allows them to set the right goals for their teams and help them be successful.

When recruiters screw up, RMs are there to help redirect or correct as needed. Like any other industry, we drop balls and make mistakes – when we get those escalations RMs dig into what happened and make it right.

A GREAT RM can make or break a recruiter’s career. Check out the accompanying video HERE.

Recruiter Accountability! Hiring Manager Edition

October 28, 2022 /

One of the strangest concepts to me is the idea that many non-recruiters have – that recruiters can INTENTIONALLY BE BAD AT THEIR JOB and no one cares.

You know what I’m talking about. According to some, we’re out here willfully ignoring applicants, leaving reqs open for months at a time, and generally sucking at our job.

Y’all. Make it make sense.

I PROMISE you – if a hiring manager is unsatisfied with the level of service they’re receiving from their recruiters, they will speak up. And if they’re not? THEY SHOULD. You may not see all the sausage making but know there is likely way more to the story – either that recruiter is getting an earful, or just maybe that role isn’t the priority some folks think it is.

In a well functioning recruiting team, joint accountability is the key. Recruiters and hiring managers both have certain responsibilities and expectations of each other that should be agreed upon and met.

In the last several years I’ve hit upon a formula that has served me well across multiple business groups in three big tech companies:

PRIORITIZATION

I created a sliding scale based on how critical a role is. Those categories each come with a particular level of service and SLA for both sides. A top priority / hair on fire / must fill req means we’re meeting at least once a week and we’re committing to a certain level of engagement / productivity (X resumes a week, Y HM reach outs, whatever). If a hiring manager does not want to make the investment, we will happily re-prioritize their role closer to the bottom of the list.

CLEAR AGENDA

Based on priority, we will meet on a regular basis. Those update meetings are critical – it’s an opportunity to share specific status updates, clarify any outstanding asks, and clean up our pipeline. If we don’t have enough candidates in process, we can also use that time to do some live sourcing together or further strategize on how to get more folks in process.

Hiring managers are a critical part of the business eco-system. They are empowered to build teams, and that is no small feat! Building a strong partnership based on mutual accountability and trust makes all of us more successful. One of my all time favorite business leaders said it best – if your recruiter isn’t your best friend, you’re doing it wrong.

Check out the accompanying video HERE

Recruiter Accountability! Candidate Edition

October 21, 2022 /

Who’s holding the recruiters accountable?

Everybody. Freaking everybody.

In the first of a 3 part video series, we’re going to dig into how recruiters are held accountable to (and by) CANDIDATES. Please understand we are talking about ACTIVE CANDIDATES here. Recruiters do NOT owe emotional labor to people who are not actively engaged with their clients/active requisitions. We DO owe accountability / closure to anyone we HAVE engaged with, even if it’s a simple “no longer under consideration” email after an application or a phone call after an interview.

So how does that work exactly?

ATS Reminders and SLAs

Many companies have rules around how quickly we need to respond or close out on active candidates. Some systems will have reminders, and some teams pull weekly status reports to make sure activity is progressing. We recruiters have to answer for any missed connections or lack of closure.

Candidate Contact Points

Now this may be an “Amy” thing – but something I have consistently done is made sure my candidates have my personal cell phone number so they can call or text me any time. Now the downside is that eleventy billion people have my number and I have an embarrassing number of unread texts / voicemails but I’m trying y’all!

Surveys

Not every company does this, but many have a post interview survey! This can be a free form text field, or perhaps “rate this process” on a scale of 1-5. Those surveys go to recruiting leadership AND they do get read and discussed! I’ve absolutely had to explain negative feedback or follow up on mistakes I’ve made (I told y’all I wasn’t perfect).

Any time we’re dealing with people (recruiters, candidates, hiring managers alike) there’s always a possibility of making mistakes. The most important thing we can do is try our best, get it “right” more often than not, and be willing to admit when we’ve screwed up / try to make it right if possible.

What would you add to help with accountability?

Networking With Recruiters! 2022 Amy’s Version

October 15, 2022 /

I wrote about this back in 2019 and hahahahaha OMG how things have changed since then.

You can read it here, if you’re curious.

So what’s changed Ames? Well, the SHEER VOLUME of requests I get. Every. Single. Day.

Simmer down haters. I know how y’all like to get confused about how recruiting works. Keep reading.

So let’s start with WHAT recruiters actually do anyway. We are hired by companies (internal or agency) to find, engage, and deliver qualified candidates. As such, our PRIMARY FOCUS is on engaging with people in our specific niche/line of business/talent populations. There are other business facing priorities, but let’s focus on the candidate/applicant/prospect side.

For many recruiters, our priorities are as follows:

  • Applicants (folks who applied directly to our open roles)
  • Employee Referrals
  • Sourced prospects

My personal policy and what I encourage my team to do, is to check the applicant buckets first thing every morning. Yes, some roles get hundreds of applicants, but rarely overnight. Even in those cases it’s still a good practice to quickly review/forward/disposition on a daily basis. Over the last few years direct applicants have been my personal best source of hire! Sourced candidates (found by me / my team) and formal employee referrals (via my company’s internal career site) round out our list.

OK Ames, we get it – but what about people who want to approach you?

Let me clear up one ridiculous misconception RIGHT NOW – I LOVE interested, qualified prospects sliding into my DMs. Love it. Absolutely love it. You think I dress up in silly costumes every week and come up with funny ways to bring attention to my open roles for the hell of it?

Y’all – I WANT people who could fit my roles to find me and talk to me.

Those folks are my SECOND priority, after direct qualified applicants. I try to quickly scan my various inboxes daily to make sure I’m not missing any hot prospects or urgent requests. I also share contact info for our entire recruiting team, which is the single best way (AFTER applying directly) to get in touch with us about roles we’re hiring for.

But what about everyone else? Job seekers need help!

Y’all have to understand that my day job is what allows me to create all the other content for folks I will never hire. That means my day job HAS to be my priority. I started this blog and later YouTube channel BECAUSE I was no longer able to keep up with all the one to one requests. I have no special skills. I was not born into privilege, nor was I handed any opportunity. I had to figure out the hard way what worked for me, how to network effectively, and what a proper job search strategy (FOR ME) looked like. My primary goal with this “side hustle” is to help the average, every day job seeker who does NOT have certain privileges navigate all this better. My content is FREE, no strings attached, and available to anyone who wants it.

I sincerely welcome any and all messages from anyone who wants to get in touch – I’m merely asking for a little grace and understanding if I can’t respond right away, or worse – completely miss your message and fail to respond at all. I will never – EVER – be mad that someone reached out to me.

Now there are SOME individuals who think I could provide more value by responding to hundreds of people every week with “sorry can’t help you” instead of “making videos every day”. (Once a week, sparky. I make videos once a week. Math is hard I know).

Now that we have a bit more CONTEXT, let’s dig into what job seekers CAN do to stand out and get helpful responses!

Get clear on your ask

If you just want to network or add someone to your LinkedIn connections, that’s totally ok! You can say that! Unfortunately I’m at the max LI allows, but I encourage folks to follow me to stay connected. Feel free to engage in comments, tag me in posts, I’m cool with that! If you want to DM me, please tell me EXACTLY what it is I can help with. If I see the message (and honestly, I get SO MANY I know I miss a bunch) I’ll do my best to answer quickly – even if it’s redirecting you back to a video or post I already made.

Do your homework!

I cannot stress this part enough – contacting the RIGHT recruiter(s) is such an important first step. Most of us are pretty good at highlighting our industries, the company we recruit for, and the kinds of roles we’re looking to fill. Simply targeting your message to the RIGHT kind of recruiter is already a game changer, and fairly low lift.

Connect with / Follow industry pros

So many job seekers default to RECRUITERS, which is fine! Most of us really do want to help and it’s like Christmas when qualified folks land in our inboxes. However, those messages can be accidentally missed in a sea of other requests. Don’t sleep on networking with fellow (insert title here) and their leaders! If I was looking for a new recruiting job, you better believe I’m hitting up RECRUITERS and recruiting MANAGERS at companies I want to work for.

OK Ames you’ve convinced me – now what do I SAY?

I got you! I’ve written targeted networking templates you can access HERE. These templates are intended to give you a framework you can personalize to your specific requests and target audience. I have lots of other content like Salary FAQs, Recruiting FAQs, all kinds of stuff to help you navigate this all more effectively. If you like videos, I’ve curated a whole playlist you might want to start with. – Job Seeker Survival Guide

To sum it up –

Friends, let me be vulnerable with you for a moment. While 90% or more of the reactions I get to my content is positive, I get my share of very loud haters. I’ve had people tag CEOs of three major tech companies (my employers) trying to get me fired. I’ve been insulted, threatened, and accused of all kinds of nefarious nonsense. I refuse to share my family on social media (rarely even pictures) because my KIDS have been targeted by strangers angry that I didn’t give them something they demanded of me.

There is NO profession – including recruiters – that deserves the vitriol certain folks lob our way. The fact that recruiters remain accessible after what we go through should be celebrated! I know my content (let alone my style) is not for everyone, and that is OK! My only ask is if you HAVE benefited from anything I’ve shared, please pay it forward. Share with your friends. I don’t want lifelong followers – my hope is that folks leverage my insights, get the role(s) they want and help the next group of job seekers.

I never want to shame anyone for seeking help. EVER. Asking for help is a sign strength, in my opinion. Recognizing your gaps, or where you need a lift, is a wonderful thing. I sincerely want to be that lift to as many people as I can, as effectively as possible.

Recruiters are human too – don’t forget that when asking us to put the HUMAN back in Human Resources.

P.S. – for the salty little potatoes in recruiting who think I owe literally every single person who contacts me a response – please leave your contact information below. I will add it to my auto-responder so that these folks can go to YOU for the direct, one on one assistance I am unable to provide. We thank you for your service. Alternatively, you can see if shutting up is right for you.

Should You Work EXCLUSIVELY With One Recruiter?

August 26, 2022 /

Would you consider signing and exclusivity agreement with a recruiter to represent you?

While it may seem like a good idea… it’s important to keep in mind that recruiters ultimately work for THEIR CLIENTS (aka the hiring manager/company) and NOT you – the candidate. What are the scenarios in which a single point of contact or representative might work out?

Internal Recruiters

Once you are actively interviewing for a role, if you’re working with an internal or corporate recruiter it is IMPERATIVE that you keep them in the loop of any other conversations you might be having. Most internal recruiters are happy to share internally, and generally want to land you for the company and not just their specific requisition. Recruiters also tend to leave detailed notes in the ATS to trying to game the system by having lots of side chats with different recruiters actually harms more than it helps. Be transparent with your recruiter if you’re interested (and qualified!) for roles outside of the one you’re being considered for.

Agency Recruiters

Similarly to internal recruiters, agency recruiters will likely have some tagging or “ownership” rules regarding your candidacy – meaning they can represent you across any of the opportunities their agency has access to. They will often share with their colleagues try to to connect you to roles managed by other recruiters. Having a single point of contact within the agency is a good idea – working with MULTIPLE agencies is also a good idea!

Right To Represent

This is where it gets tricky. Some companies (particularly larger firms) maybe have multiple agencies working on the same hiring need. Now personally, I think this is a TERRIBLE idea – but no one asked me so here we are. SO – this is one of the rare instances I might agree to let a specific recruiter from a certain agency represent me exclusively – with the caveat that it is for THIS ROLE and ORGANIZATION.

As usual, your personal mileage can vary greatly depending on the firm, client base, and kinds of roles you’re talking about. The most important thing is to understand the pros and cons of such an agreement. Anything that unnecessarily hinders you from talking with other companies or potential opportunities would be a non-starter for me.

Have you – as a job seeker – ever committed to “exclusivity” with a recruiter? How did it work out?

For more on this topic, check out the accompanying AMA Friday video HERE

« Older posts

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

© 2024 Recruiting In Yoga Pants

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑